Review: Roland Gaia SH-01
Talking about Rolandās infamous supersaw you might have a hard time finding dance music producers who did not hear about it. Besides, who can imagine the band Scooter without an HP + JP on stage? ;) However, Roland seems to like a regular re-wrap of the supersaw synth line ā which is why we got our hands on the new Roland Gaia SH-01, just to see if this synth can still create the magic feeling of the good old JP era, and hopefully some moreā¦
At first glanceā¦
Letās start with the very obvious while/after unboxing. The Gaia is a light-weighted synthesizer that can also run on batteries. The synthesis architecture is simple and directly accessible via the front panel controls. Considering the price, manufacturing quality is surprisingly good, no comparison to the former SH-201. Itās quite sad Roland didnāt build in a velocity sensitive keyboard: every note is triggered at full velocity (127). Besides that, starting up the synth is simple plugān’play ā weāre ready to experience its sound!
Integrating the Gaia into your setupā¦
Before sharing some sound impressions we should talk about Gaiaās connectivity ā how does it integrate into live gigs and studio work? Simple and easy: install the driver (available for all common windows and mac OS), connect the synth via USB, fire up your sequencer ā and youāre done. Really sadly, thereās no editor available to date which would simplify patch creation and saving. Hopefully the Roland guys will work on that, shouldnāt be too hard to modify the SH-201 editor to run with Gaia? Nice in terms of production: once connected to your sequencer, you (temporarily) select Gaia to be the active soundcard, play live or playback a midi ā and record this to an audio track. Done. Recording audio (24 bit) via Gaiaās usb port works like a charm!

connectivity [click to enlarge]
USB: midi and audio recordingā¦
Now you might ask: why canāt Access do what Roland obviously can? Too many times we heard about the virus TI recording issues⦠Well, at first we have to admit that nowadays also the virus recording works mostly fine. However, thereās probably a difference between a ārealā VA synth like virus TI, that has to calculate the whole synthesis pathway, and a probably sample-/ waveform based synth like Gaia. Who would sell a real 64-voice calculating unit for such a low price? Why canāt we regulate the supersaw spread? Why is there a choice between different versions of simple oscillator forms like a sine? All this may point once more into the direction that Gaia is an at least partially waveform-/ sample-based synth.
Beam me up, D-Beam!
Personally, a really big shot is the D-Beam technology. You can control loudness, filter cutoff, effect strength, lfo rate and much more by moving your hand up and down ā this is just pure fun when using the Gaia live, like for manual sidechaining of pads or totally crazy synth shots. Talking of the fun part: besides the D-Beam you can record short phrases and apply them maybe as a background pattern to any patch. Moreover, you can connect your MP3 player and thereby add your Gaia sound to the actual song. You can even eliminate the center part of the song, probably to get rid of vocals or bass/kick; however, as modern vocals and quite some basses are nicely distributed in the stereo field, not just placed in the center, this technology might not work so well. Still, itās all about funā¦
I want SOUNDā¦
Maybe itās time to finally talk about the sound qualities and synthesis versatility of the Gaia. First of all, this is definitely a bread & butter synth for dance music, with typical VA waveforms (saw, sine, pulse, square, triangle) plus a noise generator ā and of course the famous supersaw. For each waveform you can choose a few variations, probably Roland sampled some dirty versions of the raw waves to spice up a pretty normal sound engine so far. However, especially for someone new to VA synthesis, the Gaia can be the optimal choice: you get lots of sound creation possibilities at nice quality. Moreover, you quickly understand how VA synthesis works and can tweak your sound at various stages, thickening the patch by layering up to 3 oscillators, each of them offering all waveforms.
The built-in effects are definitely worth a mention: you can distort your sound using either a bitcrusher, a fuzzy or more common distortion effect; you may choose between phaser, flanger or pitchshift and finally add delay and a taste of reverb. A āboostā function puts more body to the sound, if desired. Overall, the effect quality is nice, even the reverb doesnāt sound bad at all. Still, only limited parameters are accessible, such as effect amount and flanger speed or reverb room size. However, for live purposes the effects do another great job, especially together with the D-Beam. JP-series fans will of course miss the chorusā¦
What about the factory presets? Yep, a question many of you might ask, and, regarding the ābudget audienceā this synth aims at, also a pretty important one. Well, letās just say there are loads of normal patches ā standard basses, pads, supersaw dance leads and typically wide fat pads thereof, some plucks, arpeggios and bad distorted synth sounds. You may find a few experimental ones, too ā but the rest is up to you: get creative! Still, talking of dance music, those factory presets might be a good starting point to create your own patches.
Whooop!
Here we go with some examples directly from the Gaia. We used factory presets only and recorded via the Gaia USB, no additional processing/mastering except a smooth limiter. Please note that any melody used here is for demo purposes only and might be copyrighted.
We need to talkā¦
Letās switch to the uncomfortable part. Playing a G3 with a naked supersaw oscillator and then comparing the sound to an A3, you will recognize a drop in brilliance, like applying a highcut. The effect is also well audible at G2/A2, below and above it more and more vanishes. We could not reproduce this effect on a JP8000; so far, Roland Japan talks of āinternal patented specifications that are typical for the supersawā. Especially after comparison with a JP8000 we donāt see this point, for us itās much more likely the consequence of wack sampling. In the sound demo below you may also notice that a JP8000 supersaw sounds a bit more smooth and clear than a Gaia supersaw…
This issue goes even further. Each oscillator offers 3 variations, and at least one of them is most likely having a similar issue, but a bit more randomly. Playing one note after another, over the whole 3-octave keyboard range, the oscillator chosen does not behave the same! This is not only annoying, it’s also clear proof that Gaia uses samples to create the oscillators. Below we sum up where we experienced the problems:
Saw (“red LED”)
Pulse (standard)
PW (standard)
Triangle (“red LED)
Supersaw (all 3 variants)
We discussed a lot with other experts about this, however, there are already some cases where users admire a plugin for being very cpu-friendly despite a great sound: and the reason behind that is the use of wavetables instead of calculating real oscillations. Not only due to this, the best explanation for these issues is an at least partially wavetable-based synthesis engine. Whatever the real reason for this behavior is, Roland will hopefully fix this issue soon.
Don’t get us wrong: this holds true for a single, naked oscillator – and regarding the price, the overall sound of Gaia together with all the effects is still nice and playing the synth is lots of fun! Really working with the Gaia you will layer sounds, apply a filter, effects and everything – and, most importantly, you will play many notes at a time. This is why you probably won’t even notice these problems. Hence, going for bigroom electronic music or music production paying attention to the little details, you might find this really annoying. Below you can listen to this issue. You first hear supersaw G3>pitchbend to A3, then a directly played A3. After that, you hear the same done on a JP8000.
Summary
Well, letās sum up what we get for around 700 bucks. A well built, at least partially sample-/ waveform based VA synthesizer with high polyphony, all classical waveforms + supersaw, available for all 3 oscillators, and 1 overall lfo (way too less for many sound designers). Together with the effect section (distortion, flanger/phaser/pitchshifter, delay, reverb), sound quality is pretty nice; still, a clear drawback is the issue that quite some oscillator forms are sampled at bad quality – which comes into play as soon as you get into detailled sound design. We would recommend this synth to all who need a budget, robust, versatile live synth, to all who are new to VA synthesis, and maybe to people who are still in love with the supersaw and want to ātouch itā instead of using sample libraries available.
Roland Gaia SH-01, approx. 700 US$
rolandus.com

Next Post: Interview: George Reales (discoDSP) »
Previous Post: Review: Wave Alchemy Drum Machines 02 »
Related Posts
7 Comments › Leave yours
Leave a Reply




























ashorin #
it was very interesting to read this article.
I want to quote your post in my blog, if possible?
And do you have an account on Twitter?
pro|tone #
thank you! of course you can, please include our URL. you can also follow us on twitter: http://twitter.com/pro_tone
alan #
damn, found this too late. same problem for me. roland very uncooperative (“dont like it? dont buy it”)… kiss my a** roland, never ever again!
emen #
I spent couple of minutes at your site and i am very impressed, very good articles
Regards
Luc #
By the way, the GAIA has velocity. By default it’s on fix velocity mode. You have to hold “Shift” + “Key Hold” to active the real velocity mode. It’s on page 51 of the owner manual.
I looked for it, and finally got the info from Roland Canada.
Cheers!
pro|tone #
merci beaucoup Luc! very useful information! really missed this (like many others we hardly read manuals). still it’s a strange decision of roland to fix the velocity by default…
Ruzkut #
One more correction,
It has 3 LFOs, one for each layer (not “… 1 overall lfo.. “)
By the way that’s a really useful post, thanks :)
p.s. maybe if you could correct the errors would be better for all the future readers… I think.